Conclusion - Pros
Conclusion - Cons
Overall conclusionThe EF-S 17-85mm is a major step up from Canon’s EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II kit lens, adding an extended focal length range, image stabilisation, fast and silent autofocus with a decent manual focus option, and substantially improved build quality. This makes it, at first sight at least, an ideal all-in-one ‘walkaround’ lens for Canon’s APS-C SLRs, which will cover the majority of photographic opportunities when travelling light. And to a great extent it delivers on this potential, with good imaging performance over much of its range, especially in that extended telephoto region, plus effective image stabilisation which works as promised. But there’s no getting away from this lens’s Achilles’ Heel, which is comparatively poor optical performance at the wideangle end. Most intrusive is the green/magenta chromatic aberration at 17mm, which is highly visible in a wide variety of shooting situations. Now if you’re only planning on viewing files on screen or making small prints, this may not be a huge problem, but if you are making large prints or viewing at 100% it’s a clear issue. However it can be effectively overcome if you are prepared to shoot in RAW and eliminate the CA in post-processing, using either Canon's Digital Photo Pro (v3.4 or later) or third party software such as Photoshop. The lens also exhibits significant barrel distortion at 17mm, making it far from ideal for photographing architecture, except perhaps Gaudi in Barcelona, or City Hall amd the ‘Gherkin’ in London. And with its relatively slow maximum aperture, this is also not an ideal lens for low light/indoor photography of people or other moving subjects. It’s important to appreciate that while image stabilisation will allow hand-holding at slower shutter speeds than usual without suffering image degradation due to camera shake, those shutter speeds are still slow, and moving subjects will therefore still be blurred. Likewise the slow maximum aperture will limit flash range, so for this kind of photography, a faster zoom or prime lens will be a better option. So overall the judgement to be made is whether the attractive feature set of this lens offsets the negatives, and most importantly the problems with distortion and chromatic aberration at wide angle. If you shoot primarily towards the telephoto end, this lens will reward you with excellent results, but if your interests tend more towards the wideangle end of the spectrum and you don't want to shoot RAW, then it may well be a good idea to look away now. However overall it must be said this lens is really rather enjoyable to use; the zoom range is very flexible, the autofocus fast and silent, and the image stabilizer highly effective. So in balance its advantages probably outweigh its disadvantages, and despite its faults this lens is ultimately still one of our favourites for Canon's APS-C dSLRs. Therefore, as long as its limitations are appreciated, it just about earns our recommendation. GOOD FOR: NOT SO GOOD FOR:
Recommended (with reservations)
Want to make
sure you don't miss out on any future reviews? Enter the 'Canon SLR Lens Talk' Discussion Forum Samples GalleryThere are 15 images in the samples gallery. Please do not reproduce any of these images on a website or any newsletter / magazine without prior permission (see our copyright page). We make the originals available for private users to download to their own machines for personal examination or printing (in conjunction with this review), we do so in good faith, please don't abuse it. Unless otherwise noted images taken with no particular settings at full resolution. A reduced size image (within 1024 x 1024 bounds) is provided to be more easily viewed in your browser. As always the original untouched image is available by clicking on this reduced image.
|
| Share: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.
