Previous page Next page

Canon PowerShot G1 X Hands-on Preview

January 2012 | Richard Butler and Andy Westlake


Preview based on a pre-production Canon PowerShot G1 X with firmware 1.0

Anyone watching the emergence of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras will have spent much of the last year patiently waiting for Canon and Nikon to show their hands. Nikon clearly decided such cameras didn't need large sensors, and now it appears Canon has concluded they don't need interchangeable lenses. Both these moves make sense for companies wanting dedicated photographers to keep buying DSLRs, but Canon's approach is likely to be of more interest to those enthusiasts.

The Canon PowerShot G1 X may look like the company's existing G-series compacts, but is a very different prospect. It's a large sensor camera with a flexible 28-112mm-equivalent, 4x zoom lens and extensive manual controls. The company says it sees it as a camera for photographers who already have a high end DSLR such as a 5D Mark II or 7D, but at a price of $799, we think it'll appeal much more widely than that. After repeated waves of cameras aimed at point-and-shoot upgraders, it's heartening to see a camera really living up to the billing of a 'serious compact.'

The sensor in the G1 X is 18.7 x 14mm, which means it's 20% smaller than the sensors Canon uses in most of its DSLRs. However it's slightly larger than the Four Thirds size used by Olympus and Panasonic, and more than 4x the area of the Fujifilm X10's sensor. Noticeably, its pixel count is also around 20% lower than Canon's 18MP DSLR chip - supporting its assertion that its design is closely related, with the same underlying pixel design. This can only bode well, given the high quality results that cameras such as the EOS 7D can produce.

On top of this the G1 X offers almost all of the extensive external controls that appear on the G12 - a camera that is itself the product of many generations of evolution. The only reservation we have about the G12 is that there's an awful lot of camera for such a small sensor - so the combination of G-series build quality and ergonomics with a sensor to match that capability is extremely promising. The G1 X doesn't replace the G12, but instead supplements it in Canon's lineup, adding a new tier to the G series.

Using a built-in lens, rather than a lens mount, helps keep the size of the package down, and allows Canon to offer a really useful 28-112mm equivalent range. There may be Mirrorless cameras that rival the G1 X for size (Panasonic's GX1 with power zoom lens, for example), but none can do so while offering such a flexible zoom range. And, although an aperture range of F2.8-5.8 isn't going to attract low-light enthusiasts, it will offer at least the control over depth-of-field that a DSLR kit lens will give.

Just for DSLR owners?

And that's enough to make us think Canon is being a little modest in suggesting that this is a camera for high-end DSLR owners. There's every reason to suspect the G1 X will offer the capability of a Rebel/600D in a smaller package and at a slightly lower price. Given that few low-end DSLR users ever take the kit lens off their camera, then so long as they're not put off by its 'serious' looks, the G1 X could find a much bigger audience.

With its flip-out 920k dot (VGA) screen, metal construction, optical viewfinder, stabilized lens, twin control dials, customizable shortcut button and exposure compensation dial, it offers a lot to anyone who wants to get involved in the photographic process. Despite trying to create a camera that won't directly compete with its DSLRs, Canon may have inadvertently added to the list of cameras many would-be Rebel buyers will look at instead.

Canon G1 X specification highlights

  • 14MP 1.5" CMOS sensor (18.7 x 14mm)
  • 28-112mm F2.8-5.8 lens
  • Optical viewfinder
  • ISO 100-12,800
  • 3.0", 920,000 dot swivelling LCD
  • Extensive manual control
  • 14-bit Raw shooting
  • 4.5fps continuous shooting (up to 6 frames)
  • 6.8Wh NB-10L battery rated at 250 shots (CIPA standard)
The G1 X's sensor is 20% smaller than in most Canon DSLRs, but that still makes it 16% larger than Four Thirds, more than twice the size of the sensor in Nikon's 1 cameras and over six times the size of the sensors in previous Canon G-series compacts.

Compared to the Canon PowerShot G12

While the G1 X may initially appear to be a G12 with a slightly lumpier lens on the front, putting them side-by-side makes clear that Canon hasn't quite achieved the impossible: it hasn't fitted a sensor six times larger into the same body size. However, it's done a great job of minimizing the difference. With the lens retracted, the G1 X is 5mm wider and 17mm thicker than the already brick-like G12. Note though that the G1 X has a narrower lens range, that extends only to 112mm-equivalent (as opposed to 140mm).

The G12 isn't exactly the smallest of compacts, and the expansion required to accommodate that larger sensor (and the larger lens it requires) have made the G1 X still less portable - although it'll still just about fit into a large jacket or coat pocket. However, for a camera with such a large sensor, useful lens range and a viewfinder, there's little to touch it.

If you visit most major tourist destinations, it's unusual not to encounter a smattering of people willing to carry a G-series camera with them. And, if they're willing to carry a camera this size, it seems reasonable to assume many people will accept a further expansion if it comes with a substantial image quality improvement.

Compared to the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Here's the G1X alongside its anagrammatic interchangeable-lens competitor, Panasonic's Lumix DMC-GX1 fitted with its tiny X 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 OIS powerzoom. The GX1 offers interchangeable lenses, but the G1 X has a larger sensor, longer lens range, optical viewfinder, and articulated LCD.

The G1 X is rather taller than the GX1, due substantially to its built-in optical finder, but is only marginally thicker despite its longer zoom range and articulated LCD. Of course the GX1 only 'wins' here due to its unique pancake powerzoom - no other kit zoom for mirrorless systems comes close to this degree of compactness.

Sensor size and aperture: relationship to low light image quality and background blur

The G1 X has a much larger sensor than other fixed-lens compacts, which implies it should offer much better high ISO image quality. But for fixed-lens cameras, that's only half of the story, and lens speed plays a crucial role when considering low light performance. Smaller-sensor cameras such as the Olympus XZ-1 and Fujifilm X10 sport lenses which are rather faster than the G1 X's, by a stop or more at wideangle and two stops at telephoto. This means that, under any given lighting, you can always use lower ISOs with these cameras. This will go some way to offsetting the G1 X's larger-sensor advantage - especially at telephoto.

Much the same reasoning applies when considering how well each camera will be available to deliver blurred backgrounds when shooting portraits. Here the optical calculations deliver an answer that some may find surprising: when shooting portraits at the long end of the zoom with the lens wide open, the G1 X will offer little advantage over either the X10 or XZ-1 in terms of subject isolation and background blur. Of course this isn't anywhere near the whole story with regard to overall image quality, but it's worth knowing.

Overall, though, the G1 X's combination of large sensor and 4x zoom lens should still provide more compositional flexibility, coupled with equal or better low-light capability, when compared to a DSLR or mirrorless interchangeable lens camera used with a typical kit zoom (14-42mm F3.5-5.6 or 18-55mm F3.5-5.6). It should also overall outperform smaller-sensor compacts like the X10 and XZ-1. However it's important to understand that the differences won't necessarily be as great as sensor size alone might suggest.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2012 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page
Share:

Comments

Total comments: 1032
12345
Class Four
By Class Four (Feb 22, 2012 at 20:48:01 GMT)

Not sure whats up with the Studio pics but I don't like edges and corners either.

0 upvotes
jmmgarza
By jmmgarza (Feb 21, 2012 at 21:39:57 GMT)

Gotta love this tourist camera. I can see myself taking snaps of the Eiffel Tower now.

1 upvote
Daniel Y
By Daniel Y (Feb 20, 2012 at 16:21:41 GMT)

Ok, Engadget and PCmag had their reviews of this camera last week (2/13 and 2/9)? I know the reviews are not comparable, but is there an ETA for Dpreview's review?

Thanks.

0 upvotes
Gyrus
By Gyrus (Feb 20, 2012 at 08:17:17 GMT)

I forgot to tell it's there in the JPEG files as well as the RAW files

0 upvotes
Gyrus
By Gyrus (Feb 20, 2012 at 08:10:18 GMT)

I'm wanting to buy this camera as my first digital camera (apart from my iPhone)
Have shot with films (Canon F1 new and some nice L lenses) and still do but it's getting really expensive nowadays.

When I look at the test-shots (real world) and this 'standard studio scene shot'
I like a lot I see.

What I find awkward is when I look at the 'circle shaped black&white star' in the center of the test photo ( just underneath the white center cross ) Why is there a horizontal line a quarter above the center of the 'star'? It looks like there is a piece missing? The black&white stripes seem to disconnect.
Same withe the G12 only then it's a vertical line a quarter to the left of the center.

Is it my screen? Or my eye for detail?

Can anyone explain this to me?

0 upvotes
pixel_peeper
By pixel_peeper (Feb 20, 2012 at 04:33:48 GMT)

Time to ditch this studio scene for something flatter. There is too much depth in it for the thin depth of field of the latest, high-resolution cameras. People are complaining about lack of sharpness when the part of the scene they're looking at is merely out of focus.

0 upvotes
BillPryor
By BillPryor (Feb 18, 2012 at 14:29:20 GMT)

Is there any way to set shutter speed (at 1/48 or 1/50 for 24p recording) in movie mode, or does the camera change it at will? If you can't lock down shutter speed, that makes it worthless as a second camera for video shoots. I see how you can, awkwardly, lock auto focus and lock exposure--better than nothing, but what about shutter speed? If there's a way to set and lock shutter speed, I'd buy this tomorrow. I shoot mostly video, some stills, with a 5DII and need a snapshot camera but want one that could be used in an emergency for video, or as a B-camera. Any info about shutter speed will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

0 upvotes
Nerval
By Nerval (Feb 21, 2012 at 09:15:08 GMT)

Hi Bill,

I mainly (almost only) shoot stills, and when I read your comment I got curious about this shutter speed thing.

I mean, when I shoot videos from time to time I usually set my aperture value and let the camera decide about the speed, I just make sure to have a high enough iso setting to avoid lags.

Pllease forgive my ignorance on the topic, but what does locking the shutter speed provides?

Doesn't the camera capture images at a regular frequency by itself anyway ? in order to avoid "jumps".

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
sarkozy
By sarkozy (Feb 18, 2012 at 13:06:50 GMT)

Canon G1X HDR-Video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl63USkCSMc

0 upvotes
dominic2
By dominic2 (Feb 18, 2012 at 12:55:36 GMT)

How come at 3200 ISO, Nex-5N look worse than Nex-5 in the raw comparisons?

0 upvotes
razorfish
By razorfish (Feb 18, 2012 at 12:03:33 GMT)

Auto iso only goes to 1600?? What's the point then?

0 upvotes
24images
By 24images (Feb 18, 2012 at 08:58:38 GMT)

Two things :
1- Is there any possibility to install a filter to protect the front lens and/or a hood ? I see a sort of baïonnet that might have this fonction ?
2- Why not use the superb ring for the same fonctions than a s95 or s100 (really great) instead of a useless cosmetic cover ?

0 upvotes
maccam
By maccam (Feb 18, 2012 at 01:33:21 GMT)

The G1X is not focused at the same point as the other cameras. if you go to the studio scene comparisons and go to the robot face. Just look at the default choices. The other 3 cameras have a line near bottom right going about 1/3 of the way up, slanted to the left, going through the blue rectangle and ending in the red. Where is it in the G1X shots? At no ISO is it visible. How do they set the focus point for these test shots? I'm even seeing a vertical line in the EOS 600D shot that doesn't show up on the other three. This is not a level playing field.

2 upvotes
ecm
By ecm (Feb 17, 2012 at 23:47:22 GMT)

I'd like to see a photo with the G1-X beside the T3i with the 18-55 IS.... is it really that much smaller?

Comment edited 21 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Optical1
By Optical1 (Feb 18, 2012 at 00:19:47 GMT)

Yep. The height difference mostly has to do with the pentaprism hump on the T3i, but the depth is where the difference really makes itself felt. The G1X including the lens protrusion is slimmer than the T3i without a lens attached! Follow the link below to see for yourself...

http://camerasize.com/compare/#257,99

Comment edited 38 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
ecm
By ecm (Feb 18, 2012 at 15:39:25 GMT)

Hey, great site - thanks for the link.

0 upvotes
Ruy Penalva
By Ruy Penalva (Feb 17, 2012 at 20:29:42 GMT)

The golden color is completely altered when we compared the four machine samples, which of them reflect the near real color? The sharpness and contrast seems to be less accentuated in G1 X too. There is a complete different management of color in G1 X shen compared to EOS 600D. When we talk about color in digital photography we are generally speaking in a different color of that observed by the human eyes.

0 upvotes
linnwm
By linnwm (Feb 17, 2012 at 17:12:57 GMT)

I have been struggling with the samples a bit. At first pass comparing to the E-PL2 which I have now, the G1 X seemed soft. When I put the widget rectangle on the lower left of the playing card, the needle (or whatever it is) sticking out of the rug and pointing to the x on the square piece of paper seems much sharper on the G1 X, but the heart on the card is much softer. Is this just depth of field?

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 17, 2012 at 19:02:43 GMT)

Good question. There is just something about this photo that is puzzling. They used the long end of the telephoto with max f stop. To me, in general the photo lacks sharpness, which points to the lens at the long end or it's out of focus. I don't know, but something is just not right considering that this is studio test shot.

0 upvotes
NowHearThis
By NowHearThis (Feb 17, 2012 at 16:38:38 GMT)

I think the lens a little bigger limiting factor to the overall image quality of the G1X, away from the middle 2/3rds of the image, the image gets progressively softer (e.g. the whole label on the Martins bottle and the batteries on the left side as well as the feathers and watch face on the other side of the image). Generally, sharpness in the center is good and I think Canon made a wise choice going with a larger sensor (verses something like a V1/Pentax Q). Some of the colors are a bit off, for example, Mickey's face has a strong magenta color cast to it. Pluto looks too orange as well. But for a first attempt it's pretty good. I would prefer interchangeable lenses and and EVF, but I know others might not. It'll be interesting to see what Canon chooses to do with this sensor (or ones like it) in the future.

0 upvotes
zavart
By zavart (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:57:06 GMT)

Oh, and there is one more thing worth comparing! Please make a close up of ancient figure's face (left side) where the horizontal lines are touching the face ! The only camera which can rival little Canon G1X is Sony's Nex7! Amazing performance !

0 upvotes
Fredrik Glckner
By Fredrik Glckner (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:52:01 GMT)

I have speculated that the G1X uses the sensor from the Panasonic GH1. The reason why I have speculated so, is that the specified size and resolutions are remarkably similar. My reasoning is here:

http://m43photo.blogspot.com/2012/02/canon-g1x-sensor-size-same-as-gh1.html

Canon has previously been known to use a Panasonic sensor, it was in an early pro DSLR from almost ten years ago.

0 upvotes
zavart
By zavart (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:37:02 GMT)

I have compared the raw results from canon G1X with Olympus E-5 Canon7D and Nikon 7000 and so far I don't see any problems with the IQ! In fact , when You consider that all the other cameras were tested with their best prime lenses it looks that little G1X performs splenditly. I also don't see any problems with corner sharpness! When You close up to the little checkboard in the left corner the only camera which does better is Olympus E-5 (no wonder! since the zuiko lenses were optimised for the 3/4 format and this test was probably done with their best macro lens) What is incredible is that You can actually see the texture of the paper behind this checkboard , something which is totally missing in the Nikon 7000 test and only Canon 7D is coming close. Also please check little sign" C Eastman Kodak" on the top of KODAK GREY SCALE!

0 upvotes
AndrePooh
By AndrePooh (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:24:52 GMT)

Corner sharpness may be just random variation of the particular lens. look at the left upper corner far better than the 600D. Right upper corner is about on par. However Left under is clearly better for the 600D. Also right under is for the 600D albeit less distinct.

0 upvotes
Plutone
By Plutone (Feb 17, 2012 at 11:54:39 GMT)

As a G11 user I am a bit disappointed, this is not a big leap forward, corner sharpness of the G11 is actually better the this camera.

Comment edited 6 minutes after posting
1 upvote
Leo33
By Leo33 (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:47:53 GMT)

Yes, and the G11 has a faster and longer lens as well! :)

0 upvotes
Dmitriy Balashov
By Dmitriy Balashov (Feb 19, 2012 at 15:39:31 GMT)

That's the question what's more important - sharp corners or clear iso1600.
I think iso is more important.
One or two step slower end isn't even noticeable.

0 upvotes
Coyote_Cody
By Coyote_Cody (Feb 17, 2012 at 10:52:53 GMT)

Great to see that this sensor can resolve the 'vertical' lines in the lady's face next to the dime. NONE of the 1/1.7 or 1/2.3 or seemingly the 4/3 sensors resolve these lines. Some DSLR's have a struggle, great sensor/lens test!

It does take 12mp and up to resolve these it seems, but this new sensor is doing this quite well.

Is the lens up to the quality of the sensor?

0 upvotes
jj74e
By jj74e (Feb 17, 2012 at 08:38:43 GMT)

really Canon? GX1 was already taken so you named your camera G1X? these companies need to jump off the X bandwagon. seriously...it's kind of annoying. what's so cool and marketable about X? originality and figuring out a way to market other letters would be far more appealing. not that hard to do...you just need a good graphic/logo and more importantly, a good camera to back the name up.

1 upvote
jonrobertp
By jonrobertp (Feb 17, 2012 at 04:25:01 GMT)

Love it how the G1X has better IQ at 12800 than the D7000 etc. And I own the D7k too. lol.

0 upvotes
Marcelobtp
By Marcelobtp (Feb 17, 2012 at 13:23:01 GMT)

Are you blind?

0 upvotes
S a m i
By S a m i (Feb 17, 2012 at 17:54:14 GMT)

G1X ISO12800 image was shot at F7.1 and 1/1600s and D7000 ISO 12800 image was shot at F9 and 1/3200 - that's 1 2/3 stop difference!!! No wonder G1X "ISO 12800" seem ok - it's as sensitive as ISO4000 in D7000.

0 upvotes
EinsteinsGhost
By EinsteinsGhost (Feb 17, 2012 at 21:33:55 GMT)

Check it out against Sony NEX-5N.

0 upvotes
WT21
By WT21 (Feb 17, 2012 at 01:20:42 GMT)

I think that sensor is being let down by the compact lens. It'll be interesting to see if Canon releases an ILC with this sensor.

0 upvotes
jmmgarza
By jmmgarza (Feb 17, 2012 at 00:37:14 GMT)

What a sweet little tourist camera. Will it fit in my front pant pocket? Yes, it will!

Comment edited 7 minutes after posting
4 upvotes
jj74e
By jj74e (Feb 17, 2012 at 08:36:41 GMT)

is this sarcasm? hard to tell..

1 upvote
M Jesper
By M Jesper (Feb 17, 2012 at 14:33:37 GMT)

it will fit a jacket pocket maybe if you're lucky.

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 17, 2012 at 00:20:24 GMT)

I want to buy this camera, but looking at the test shoots the image lacks sharpness. I don't think you have to post process to get a crisp image in a test shoot.

0 upvotes
attomole
By attomole (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:31:33 GMT)

Interesting comparison is with a small sensor quality camera like X10 a stop or two lower ISO compensating for the slower lens on the G1X. m my feeling is by using a big sensor they have "lost on the swings and gained on the roundabouts"

`in absolute terms the G1x is better at high ISO but in the real world not so much, I really want to like this camera though it reminds me of wonderful Mamyia 6 rangefinder roll film classic, a couple of fixed fast primes rather than compromised zoom and it would be there.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:54:36 GMT)

In the real world the sensor stops working? I don't get it. Anyway, no matter how fast the X10 lens is it isn't producing the same detail resolution as the G1 X. High ISO does have real world applications. G1 X wide open isn't much slower that the all-powerful X10, so that argument holds very little water. With the X10 up to 800 and the G1 X on at 3200 the detail out of the G1 X is still greater with a comfortable lead and even a little less noise. So much for that two stop advantage.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
1 upvote
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 17, 2012 at 00:14:16 GMT)

There is no question that fast primes can do a better job than a try to do it all zoom, but what makes this camera interesting is that if they could make the zoom a little better without pushing the cost to moon they would have a really great camera that doesn't have a lot of baggage. That would be truely great.

0 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:15:27 GMT)

Wow I finally reloaded my cache and I can see the pictures now. The Canon G1X does very nicely for noise even at high ISOs(6400 and above). I was impressed with that.

Dpreview is right though. That lens or something is making these pictures horribly soft. I hope that the real world pictures look better. If they do then this camera will sell extremely well.

1 upvote
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:30:39 GMT)

Just a bit in the corners. Use the RAW comparison and all the JPEG smudging from noise reducon at high ISO's will be replaced with detail mixed with noise. Anyway, I compared the Sony SLT-A77 (and many other cameras) and the G1 X wins on low noise and great detail even at the highest ISO.

0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:12:24 GMT)

Two crops to see as JPEGs and anywhere between ISO 100 and 800:

1. Blue VW (upper center). This shows how the cam handles flat color that is slowly changing along its curvature.

2. Pretty lady (right middle). This shows how the cam handles skin tones.

I did not change any cams in the comparison. The Oly E-P3 comes out superior to both G1X and G12, and gets better as it gets to ISO 800, where it also outperforms the 600D.

If I want my car and my lady to look their real best, the latest Pen is the way to go. Then I put Pana GX1 into the mix and it just could be the best on the VW. I am beginning to feel this is not about Canon at all.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 21:02:29 GMT)

Or switch over to RAW and see what the cameras are really doing. You'll see the E-P3 is benefiting from very uniform colors being smoothed over in their JPEG conversion. It also benefits from heavy noise reduction in those areas, but if you look at areas where there is actual detail you'll see nothing but smudge. Don't let that selective eye sight get out of hand. The other cameras are actually trying not to destroy detail....that's something they leave to you.

Comment edited 54 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
sadwitch
By sadwitch (Feb 16, 2012 at 22:35:02 GMT)

I agree there's more smudging in EP-3 which i didn't like. But seems to me the G1X has a bit of moire maze problem.

2 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 23:13:37 GMT)

Thank goodness they decided to go with a weaker AA filter for once. Probably trying to squeeze all the detail they could out of the lens/sensor combo.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:06:28 GMT)

I'm not trying to pester the hard-working people at DPReview who seem intent on providing us with information on this camera with unprecedented speed, but does this mean the full review is well underway and nearing completion?

0 upvotes
RedFox88
By RedFox88 (Feb 17, 2012 at 02:33:54 GMT)

Incorrect. If you've noticed, DPR has been putting out the studio test samples before the full review is done for many a camera lately, even for cameras that don't end up getting a full review. It's a way to get info out quicker and to get info out on cameras that aren't significant or popular enough for a full review.

0 upvotes
WillemHan
By WillemHan (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:00:20 GMT)

Look at the studo shots on www.imaging-resource.com instead. They convinced me, so I ordered one.

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:30:22 GMT)

I must be missing something. I am looking at the crops all over the frame and as near as I can see the G12 looks sharper than the G1X. Question: How did they do the focus? Auto or Manual? It doesn't look that sharp to me.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 20:35:11 GMT)

Look in the areas of great detal: the fur, face above Mickey's head, etc. It's easy to look sharper in lower MP images or when you look at a texture with very little detail at higher resolution.

0 upvotes
GeorgeD200
By GeorgeD200 (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:44:01 GMT)

Comparing the G1X with the Nikon V1 (based on price), the Olympus E-P1 ( m4/3 and I have one), and the Nex 3 (close competitor).
The lens seems to be holding the G1x back. Quality is similar to the E-P1 and Nex3 in the center of the frame, but quickly degrades at the edges, where the E-P1 is by far the best, probably because it was tested with a prime lens. The G1x actually has the lowest noise levels at ISO 800 and above, with the E-P1 second and the Nex 3rd. V1 comes in last in all categories (as expected, due to it's much smaller sensor size).

Conclusion: The G1x has potential, but is limited by the lens. If they come out with an interchangable lens version, it will go toe-to-toe with the NEX and m4/3 offerings, and often beat them. Noise levels are best-in-class (based on these samples). It'll still be the best point and shoot on the market, but it'll lack appeal for enthusiasts.

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 16, 2012 at 22:38:53 GMT)

I think the "all in one" has potential. If they would improve on the glass and the focus, I think they have a winning idea. I don't think the need interchangeable lenses to be a winner, just better glass and focus. It would server enthusiasts and point and shoot.

0 upvotes
douple
By douple (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:25:59 GMT)

iam quite impressed, g1x 12800 looks similar to Powershot G12 3200

0 upvotes
Greynerd
By Greynerd (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:20:55 GMT)

One thing that is clear to me is that nothing does as much justice to paper clips as the Olympus XZ-1. The Olly is still the undisputed paper clip imaging champion.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
vratnik
By vratnik (Feb 16, 2012 at 22:06:04 GMT)

lol.. you just killed me :D

0 upvotes
Entropius
By Entropius (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:14:48 GMT)

Wow, those reds...

0 upvotes
deep7
By deep7 (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:55:21 GMT)

This page isn't working. Works with all your other cameras. Can you fix it?

0 upvotes
Kelcey Smith
By Kelcey Smith (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:06:34 GMT)

We've re-synced or servers which should hopefully fix the problem. However, you may have to clear your cache before the widget will become visible again.

0 upvotes
Martyn McMad
By Martyn McMad (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:54:34 GMT)

Disappointed - I was really hoping for something a helluva lot better - The G12 and the P7100 look good value now !

0 upvotes
zyran
By zyran (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:39:43 GMT)

Nice. The sensor is about a stop faster than the sensors in the Panasonic G3/GX-1. If only they could've gotten their hands on this sensor.

1 upvote
Vladik
By Vladik (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:10:07 GMT)

Looks like soup! Why even bother release this junk.

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:30:35 GMT)

Hum. I have to say I am disappoint with standard test samples. They don't appear to be any better than the G12, which shocks me. Clearly the lens is no match for the sensor. Very disappointing.

0 upvotes
douple
By douple (Feb 16, 2012 at 19:25:03 GMT)

um, have you tried comparsion with dslrs?

0 upvotes
mpgxsvcd
By mpgxsvcd (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:08:18 GMT)

All I tell from these samples is that I HATE the new comparometer. It doesn't help me at all if I can't even see the samples. Please fix as soon as possible.

1 upvote
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:45:29 GMT)

Or you could download the images. JPEG and RAW are available. Is this what you mean by "see the samples"?

0 upvotes
proque
By proque (Feb 16, 2012 at 17:54:45 GMT)

As posted several times already, the comparative tests show that the G1X sensor is a great performer, even better than my NEX 5N on higher ISO (RAW). But disappointing lens performance on the corners. Since this is a fixed lens, compact APS-C camera, you have to live with it. Something to look forward if Canon continue to use the sensor in their future ILC (DSLR or maybe Mirrorless) roadmap.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:47:11 GMT)

I don't HAVE to live with my 15-85 EF-S or 10-22 EF-S, but I choose to despite the fact that they aren't magical (aka perfect).

0 upvotes
Mayank B
By Mayank B (Feb 16, 2012 at 17:53:11 GMT)

Widget not opening on Google Chrome on Mac OS 10.5.8. Opening fine on Firefox though.

0 upvotes
Zerg2905
By Zerg2905 (Feb 16, 2012 at 16:54:22 GMT)

I will definitely trade my good ol' G10 for the G1 X. And my 5DMkII for the 5DMkIII and/or 5D X. And my 7D for the 7DMkII. And my 24-70 f/2.8 L USM for the 24-70 f/2.8 L USM II... What I cannot predict is how many years it will take... Come on folks, this is the "Koenigstiger" of the Compact World. And in my opinion it should not be compared with DSLRs, 4/3s etc etc etc. It looks it's a very good "compact" class camera, and that's all. ;)

0 upvotes
thejohnnerparty
By thejohnnerparty (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:44:05 GMT)

The heck of it is that they could have put another $50 into the lens quality making the price $1,000 and had a real good little camera - a true "2nd" camera for pros and an excellent camera for enthusiasts.

0 upvotes
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:49:08 GMT)

Not another person thinking they're an undiscovered optics expert. Sigh. Make it two grand and put some rockets on it too!!!

0 upvotes
topstuff
By topstuff (Feb 16, 2012 at 15:43:22 GMT)

Either some people do not posses functioning eyeballs or I am going mad...

But I see little about the Canon G1 X to like, especially with JPEGs .

Look at the "KODAK" writing half way down the far right hand side, 1600ISO JPEG. The old Olympus sensor seems to do much better.

G1X is OK in the centre but at the edges it is poor.

Maybe its the lens. And of course there is nothing anyone can do about that because you can't change it.

For the market number 1, the Manchester United of camera makers, the imperial empire, the top dog.... this ain't good enough IMO.

1 upvote
howardroark
By howardroark (Feb 16, 2012 at 18:50:25 GMT)

My 20/10 vision is very unreliable. I do see a lot to like.

0 upvotes
gulffish
By gulffish (Feb 16, 2012 at 15:40:04 GMT)

No issues with Firefox.

0 upvotes
Thomas Kachadurian
By Thomas Kachadurian (Feb 16, 2012 at 15:28:21 GMT)

I'll stick with the GH2, but I think it's the lens, not the sensor that falls short.

0 upvotes
Vibrio
By Vibrio (Feb 16, 2012 at 15:19:17 GMT)

works perfectly well on IE9

0 upvotes
buzzif
By buzzif (Feb 16, 2012 at 15:16:30 GMT)

for those who do not see anything in your browser, you must empty the cache
(delete temp internet files).
should work...

0 upvotes
bertalan
By bertalan (Feb 16, 2012 at 14:50:22 GMT)

I got nothin on IE8

0 upvotes
Total comments: 1032
12345