Agfa ePhoto 1280

0.7 megapixels | 2" screen | 38 – 114 mm (3×)

User reviews

Average rating: 3.98
5 stars
(4)
4 stars
(6)
3 stars
(5)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
12
SusanS
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: SusanS posted on Feb 10, 2003 UTC

Opinion: This was the first digicam I owned (though I had used plenty before I bought my own). I bought the 1280 because of the trusted name in professional (rather than amatuer photography) AGFA. I knew from using other 1280 digicams that were around at the time, to not buy a Kodak, Casio, Epson etc. I owned it for about 24 months.

Excellent sharp photos, even blown up to 8x10's. I didn't realize how good till I used some other newer cameras at work and my Agfa was always better. Swivel body worked out ok. Night time light gathering capability was real good.

Problems: OK so it was a battery eater! And after a while the battery door became loose and sometimes jumped off.

The mail reason I sold my Agfa was that the firmware only recognized up to a 32? or 64?mb memory card, limiting the number of pictures you could store.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
rjcarter
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: rjcarter posted on Nov 30, 2002 UTC

Opinion: An older camera now (November 2002), but still one with unique features that I enjoy. For near 1MB pictures, the images display beautifully on a monitor. Plastic body is disappointing, but swivel lens with flash is a plust for design; also, menus are logical and easy to use (why did Agfa drop this design?). Threaded lens is another nice feature. RJC

Problems: Plastic covers for connections frequently opens; plastic, while light with good tensil strength, would have been nicer in a metal. Battery life is limited and somewhat awkward to change 4 AA batteries.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
eric tamashunas
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: eric tamashunas posted on May 8, 2002 UTC

Opinion: This is (was) a great (older) camera for short people. The swivel body allowed me to get pictures over crowds that would have been otherwise impossible. When many other digicams were the compact style I was able to capture great shots at decent resolution. The plastic body and delicate swivel need to be handled with care though.

Problems: none

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 28, 2002 UTC

Opinion: Have to get some good rechargeables pair of batteries (1800 mA min), some Smartmedia memories (8Mb) and go for take some nice pics. Exelent quality of pics, big lens aned the zoom operates just fine.

Problems: The switch it to easy to turn , and battery life its poor.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 27, 2002 UTC

Opinion: This was the 1st digital camera that I ever bought. I used it faithfully until I was introduced to the Sony DSC-S75.
The week after I bought the Sony, my AGFA "died".
The photos were actually quite good, considering the low resolution.

Problems: Very slow

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 16, 2002 UTC

Opinion: well i had to give a 5star rating for value for money becouse i had it with the pc package i find this camera great in every department

Problems: on and off knob is too easy

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Nov 8, 2001 UTC

Opinion: good value for the money at the time (2000)
I miss a good macro mode, 20cm (8") not good enough

Problems: selector wheel is easily turned, often by accident.
batteries discharging even when not in use.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Oct 25, 2001 UTC

Opinion: When the decision were made to buy a digital camera i was looking for the following features: 1- A robust camera in our harsh conditions 2- Quality and performance 3- Facility to use filters and additional lenses. And am I glad that I have chosed the very first Agfa E1280 in South Africa. As a wildlife photographer and the nature of my Eco tours in all kinds of conditions has the 1280 excelled itself. The slow loading time is certainly not a problem as I was looking for quality and performance. Wish Agfa will bring out a newer version with more feautures.

Problems: Never - despite being caught in a dust storm in the desert where my 35mm cameras failed the Agfa just kept on going!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Oct 11, 2001 UTC

Opinion: I purchased the camera May 1999 for only 4990.-ATS, that's about $330. Very good is the swivel lens design.
January 2001, the camera survived 1.5m down from the tripod to stone ground. But in September 2001, the monitor of the camera did not survive when my 3 year old doughter stumbled with the camera.

I just purchased for $150 an other AGFA 1280 for my doughter that she can continue to learn how to make photos.

Annoying is only the software from AGFA. At every program start, the AGFA software occupies the JPG ending. When downloading pictures, after each picture the AGFA software changes it's window to the top. Very annoying since downloading 30 pictures from the 4 MB card takes about 15 minutes where I would like to work with other programs without being interrupted all the time by the AGFA software poping on top of all windows.

I will purchase next a Nikon 995

Problems: The AGFA software does not work correct together with the graphics card of my new notebook. No chance to get an update of the software because AGFA does not give any support

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
12