Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS / IXUS 210 / IXY 10S

Add to: 
Canon PowerShot SD3500 IS / IXUS 210 / IXY 10S
User reviews (2)
4.30
Amazon reviews (111)
4.00
14.1 megapixels | 3.5" screen | 24 – 120 mm (5×)

The SD3500 IS (Digital IXUS 210 in Europe) ultra-compact features a 3.5 inch touchscreen LCD with 460k dot resolution. It also offers a 5x optical zoom lens starting at a useful 24mm and a 14MP sensor. The interface recognizes gestures for some commonly used features.

Average rating: 4.30
5 stars
(0)
4 stars
(2)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all user reviews ...
mrmanny
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: mrmanny posted on Mar 10, 2010 UTC

Opinion: I am comparing this camera to the following p/s I tried before settling on this one.
Sony W200 – 12 megapixel – not wide angle and automatic white balance is way off…always a problem with artificial lighting.
Nikon S570 – 12 megapixel – too automated and many out of focus photos.
Sony TX1 – 10 megapixel –good pictures but not wide angle and I fear the lens cover lid will be flopping around in a few months.
Sony WX1 -10 megapixel-good pictures, nice wide angle, almost a keeper.
Canon SD 980 IS -12 megapixel-good pictures, older model but same price as the newer SD3500 14 megapixel.
Canon A650 – 12 megapixel, very good pictures, larger sensor, folding screen, but uses AA batteries and is like carrying around half a brick. Not for the shirt pocket.
First if you shoot with a p/s camera invest in Photoshop Elements and Noise Ninja if you want to make 8x10 inch prints or possibly squeeze out an 11x14 inch print. The sensor is tiny and noise is a factor which must be dealt with during editing. You will not get image quality equal to a half frame sensor. If you only want 4x6 inch prints it will not be so noticeable.
Comparing the Canon SD3500 IS to the above I get acceptable prints considering the sensor size, AWB is pretty good but still needs tweaking. Nice wide angle, 24mm equivalent, fits in shirt pocket, touch screen which takes a bit of time to get used to. One factor to consider is the video mode which makes MOV files. Windows 7 will automatically convert these to WMV for watching on your computer but if you want to email WMV files you will have to find a conversion software and quality will suffer immediately.
As to image quality I can only give a 4 as no 1 / 2.3” sensor will give you a 5 quality for the forseeable future. Construction appears to be good as you can get for this price range and things to watch out for is the delicate battery/memory compartment lid.

Problems: No problems

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Satish Goel
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Satish Goel posted on Mar 20, 2010 UTC

Opinion: Excellent photo quality
Very good video quality (excellent for any still compact
camera)

Problems: Face detection is little poor
poor image stabilization
UI is slow in response (between two snaps & while
viewing the photos)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report