Olympus D-340L

1.2 megapixels | 2" screen | 36 mm

User reviews

Average rating: 4.18
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(7)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)
Sort by
hflavo
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: hflavo posted on Mar 28, 2007 UTC

Opinion: Purchased min in spring 2000...used mainly for shooting eBay shots, for which it is excellent (macro mode, and normal close focusing at tele). Picture color and quality is excellent for a 1.3mp camera. Uses easy to find batteries.

Problems: Sliding door has worked loose after years of service...must be held by scotch tape.

Dropped my first one and broke...cost $100 for factory service. Bought second on eBay for $50.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Apr 19, 2002 UTC

Opinion: I've used this camera for making real estate flyers for the past 3 years and have been extremely pleased with it.
It is so easy to use and takes great pictures.
No regrets whatsoever and highly recommend it.
I am buying another camera only to get a wide angle lense.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Mar 5, 2002 UTC

Opinion: Reliable! Very good picture even for standards prints.
he pan function is superb, you can shoot up to 10 images and stitch them together (via software), on a mouse click, impressive. Works with horizontal or vertical pans.
Good macro function, great details.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Frank Sinkavich
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Frank Sinkavich posted on Jan 13, 2002 UTC

Opinion: I used one for 2 and a half years. It was my first digital
camera. It was easy to use and the picture quality was
excellent. A great camera to learn about digital photography. I
sold it and moved up to a C-2020z.

Problems: None

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Dec 16, 2001 UTC

Opinion: 3 years old now and no problems. Quick startup time, nice image quality and decent battery life even on cheap alkalines. Robust - has survived being knocked and dropped over the years.

Problems: Only gripes are a long 'press to shutter release' time and an annoying tendency for the shutter to occasionally refuse to go until the button is released and repressed. This usually happens in difficult lighting conditions but can be extrememly frustrating.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Nov 19, 2001 UTC

Opinion: 3 years on and still going strong. Known as the 840L in the UK, this was my first DC and I still love it. Good colour balance, detail and sharpness for a 1.3 MP camera with a smallish lense. Particularly impressive in low light (dusk) - will happily auto focus and still produce good pics.

The SHQ (1280x960) mode produces bright and appealing 400k images. HQ (also 1280x960) is superfluous - there isn't enough detail for the large image size. SQ (640x480) shots are ideal for web/email - they seem to have less artifacts (compression?) than other low res 640x480's I have seen.

After a year I upgraded to an Olympus C-1400XL SLR (D-620L in USA), intending to sell the 840L. But I find that I still use this little camera more, even without a zoom, because it will live in my pocket/glovebox and produces consistently good results.

Problems: Totally reliable, even at -29 C in Canada! Serial interface desperately slow, but easily solved with a card reader. Battery usage OK, but needs Ni-Mh's

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on Aug 16, 2001 UTC

Opinion: When I first bought this camera 3 years ago, it cost almost
$1000. It was the best of bunch back then. It fits in my pocket
and is ready to go. I live in southeast asia and have exposed it
to the damp, heat, ect. Have dropped it several times. It still
works as good as new.

The ONLY thing that makes me want to up grade is that it has
no "portrait" mode. Take a shot of a person up close, or
example, and the knees become gigantic! With a fixed 35
mm. it's great for group shots, buildings and landscapes but
bad for intimate portaraits.

Still, a great camera.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Unknown user posted on May 16, 2001 UTC

Opinion: I have had this little camra for 3 years now and it has served me well. It was an excellent way to get into digital
photography. I just purchased the Olympus 3040 becuase I have been so satisfied with Olympus

Problems: Not a single problem in 3 years.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Fred Rothenberg
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Fred Rothenberg posted on Sep 17, 1999 UTC

Opinion: Have had the camera for about a year. It is now considered a "beginner's" camera but at the time it was the state of the art in consumer cameras. I have been very satisfied with it other than it offers no optical zoom (which has probably made me a better photographer. Have never had a single problem with the camera. But it is time to move on (the kids can have this one).

Problems: None at all

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report