65%
Recommended
|
|
|||
|
65%
Recommended
Reviewed:
Jan 2009
|
| Quick links: | Announcement | Review | Sample gallery | Forum |
| Announced: | Sep 22, 2008 |
| Summary | Although the overall specification is pretty good for this level of camera, the Km / K2000 struggles to stand out from the crowd given the mediocre JPEG quality and poorly implemented autofocus system. |
| Good for | Pentax users on a tight budget |
| Not so good for | Absolute beginners or JPEG shooters |
|
poor
excellent
|
|
| Build quality |
|
| Ergonomics & handling |
|
| Features |
|
| Metering & focus accuracy |
|
| Image quality (raw) |
|
| Image quality (jpeg) |
|
| Low light / high ISO performance |
|
| Viewfinder / screen rating |
|
| Optics |
|
| Performance |
|
| Movie / video mode |
|
| Value |
|
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category. Click here to find out more.
Posted:
Feb 1, 2010,
Images:
42
|
                                         
|
Reviews and specs
|
Galleries
|
Challenges
|
 | 22.3 megapixels 3.2" screen Full frame sensor |
