Ricoh Caplio R5

Add to: 
User reviews (23)
3.74
7.1 megapixels | 2.5" screen | 28 – 200 mm (7.1×)
Average rating: 3.74
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(12)
3 stars
(9)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 23 reviews...
William E. Cary
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: William E. Cary posted on Oct 3, 2006 UTC

Opinion: I have taken daylight and night photos with and without flash. I have only gotten two ro three reasonable photos out of 50+ so far. Most have been very, very grainy. Very unexceptable, crappy to be exact. A freind of mine got one a fews day before I did and is getting the same results. He has emailed Ricoh, but we have not heard anything.

Problems: terible results

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Eurico Melo
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Eurico Melo posted on Oct 8, 2006 UTC

Opinion: I got the R5 a few days ago to replace my Canon S40 snapshot that I always carry with me. Until now I only used it for landscape and monument photography. It is in general very responsive, and the image quality is quite good for such a small snapshot camera. The shadows are better than those of the camera it replaced, but I would prefer less contrasty pictures. The light measurement is accurate in normal scenes, but I got several underexposed pictures in dull lighting situations.

A couple of tests to the usefulness of high ISO gave the expected good results until ISO 200 and still acceptable at 400 (with some color degradation). Above 400 the R5 should only be used in desperate situations. However in Auto ISO the camera never goes above 200.
It seems that my R5 doesn’t suffer from the noise problem others have found.

Test to the camera shake correction at 200 mm shows that 2 stops are gained with confidence and about 50% success may be expected at 1/25 s.

Problems: 1) Some purple fringing (I can’t precise if at all focal lengths).
2) Croma noise perceptible above ISO 100 (at 100% magnification).
3) I miss the panorama mode of the S40. An alternative would be to lock exposure but I haven’t yet found a way to do it. For me it is the only real drawback of this camera.
4) The skew correction failed every time I tried to use it for architecture. In any case this mode is obtained at the expense of resolution.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Prognathous
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Prognathous posted on Oct 11, 2006 UTC

Opinion: I'm afraid the R5 is a flawed-gem. It has what it takes to be a top-notch pocket camera, but Ricoh had a few "execution" issues, at least with my exemplar (though many other users also report issues with the AF system).

I love a lot of things about this camera, including things that most people are worried about - resolution, corner sharpness, image-processing, noise levels, CA/PF levels. The zoom range and macro are great, and so is most of the user-interface. The R5 is definitely capable of smashing results, but is has too many issues to make me recommend it.

The main feature that convinced me to get the R5 instead of Ricoh's GX8 (which I absolutely adore) was the better video mode, but now that I think about it again, I see that I should have gone for the GX8 and get another pocket camera - a Fuji F30 or F20 - for the video and situations that require high ISO. The price would have been higher, but functionality would have been superb (enough, I believe, to keep my DSLR at home a lot more). I really dig the concept of two complementing pocket cameras (one in each pocket) and I'll probably go this route soon.

You can see pictures I took with the R5 here:

http: //boren.sent.com/Ricoh/R5/
(remove the space before the "//" when copying the link)

Problems: My camera has a few longstanding issues - the zoom lever is almost inoperable (hence the low score on ease-of-use), and I think that the imaging sensor may be mis-aligned (pictures at 200mm have uneven sharpness across the picture). In addition, the AF is not very reliable, especially when the light is a bit dim. I sent the camera to Ricoh for service, but it returned unrepaired. I'm very disappointed with the way they handled it, but hopefully they'll find a way to improve this situation (I'll update the Ricoh Talk forum on this site once (or if) they do).

Bottom line: Either get the time proven R4 (if you can find one), wait for the R6, or get something else altogether. The R5 has too many issues to make it a sensible choice - even after five firmware updates.

Prog.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
w4rmk
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: w4rmk posted on Oct 15, 2006 UTC

Opinion: You can read my mini-review and comparison with other 28mm Pocket Digicams here:
http://www.w4rmk.com/canon/canonsd800is.htm

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report