Samsung TL350 (WB2000)

Opinion: I originally bought this camera for its slow motion video capabilities but I soon found how good the stills are. The picture quality is so much better than the Canon Ixus, several of which I've tried and which are much the same size. The build is very solid too.

Videos quality is amazing from such a small camera but it is advisable to fix the white balance manually or it might suddenly change while filming, which is a bit disconcerting. I haven't found autofocus in videos to be a problem as long as you don't move too fast from near to far subjects. If you need to do this it is probably best to take the scene in two shots so that the camera gets a chance to refocus. This is common with most small cameras.

I have bought a battery charger very cheaply on eBay so that I can have a spare battery handy and don't have to charge it in the camera.

Opinion: L'appareil fourni de très bon résultats avec une bonne exposition lumineuse.
L'image est superbe de netteté et bien piquée en grand angle ( mais moins que le Canon ixus 220hs )
Le moteur jpg est très bon, aucune aberration chromatique notable.
En télé c'est moins bon mais de loin meilleur que le Canon.
Par contre la dynamique est moyenne, et en cas de fort contraste la dé-saturation , les détails sont conservés mais la chrominance a disparue ! Shooter en raw n'apporte rien
Il est difficile d'obtenir un résultat meilleur en raw tellement le jpg est bon, on risque même de faire pire !
La balance de blanc est totalement paramétrable
Le concurrent dire est pour moi le Nikon P300, en 12Mp très comparable, mais il gère mieux la dynamique avec le Hdr façon Nikon.

Opinion: I wanted a pocket SLR and the TL350 does a great job. Owning both a 7D and 5DII I wanted a camera that could take good pics for sharing and also mantain a high quality level, have manual controls, shoot fast, shoot good video, raw and fit in my pocket..... The TL350 does it all....

Image quality is great I am very happy, and the speed is very fast for a pocket cam, focus and shoot different subjects in just under a second, if all about the same distance about instant, as fast as you can frame the shot...

Price was the best in class, much less than the canon but I feel much better to shoot with, the canon feels real slow like a point and shoot....

Powering up is very slow and one of the biggest down falls it takes forever to power up but, then it is lighting fast to shoot with... Full manual controls, raw. I have takening some really good photos for 4 X 6 prints and web sharing I'm completly happy with..... With some minor lightroom adjustments the photos can hold their own on my smaller digital frame.....

No focusing during video sucks and the canon may be better for video....

Panaramic mode is sooooo cool. I like the use the TL to frame shots somtimes before I shoot with the big cameras..

I've had it almost a year, I love and I highly reconmend it.....
I feel it is the best pocket SLR.........

Opinion: During video autofocus doesn't work at all!

Look at: http://www.trustedreviews.com/Samsung-WB2000_Digital-Camera_review_design-and-features_Page-2
"Full optical zoom can be used while recording, but the autofocus only operates at the start of recording"

I've bought this camera one week ago and now is going back to Samsung. Still pictures are very good but I need video also.

Opinion: Fast little camera. Great zoom range. It does a great job in low light. The screen is one of the best I have ever used. The camera has lots of manual control and overrides for anyone's needs. There are a nice selection of auto shooting modes as well. The sweep panoramic works really well and is fun to use. The lens is bright, sharp, and delivers excellent results. The auto bracketing functions works perfectly. It's one of the best compact cameras I have ever owned.

Opinion: Hi,

I just got a WB2000 (US$375 or 250 quid, ouch). I
also considered Canon S90, Sony HX5 and waiting for
the Panasonic LX5 and Sony WX5, but the amazing
screen and the full HD video swung it for me.

BTW the lens is f/2.4 at its brightest, not f/2.8 as the
specs on this site say. It's a little sharper than the Fuji
F200EXR in the centre but a little softer in the corners.
I haven't tried all zoom settings or apertures yet so this
is just my general impression so far. It's being corrected
for distortion and CA.

It feels very nice in the hand with a good grip and
metal body. The screen is absolutely lovely. Initially I
was disappointed that the thumb wheel doesn't do
anything other than change frame options (10x, 5X,
3x, bkt, self timer etc) but the rotary wheel lower
down works very well so that's fine, and I quite like
this now.

The shooting display gives a good amount of info, and
a live histogram which is great.

It charges from my notebook USB just like my phone
so that's very convenient for me.

Start up, shot to shot, zoom and AF times are nothing
special but not slow either. With an average sd card, a
10M jpeg takes about 2-3 seconds to write to the card
in the Smart Auto mode and the cam keeps working
throughout. With a fast SDHC (30Mbs) card it's much
faster and the lag opening RAW files is very slight,
which is great news. The internal memory (only
enough for 1 raw image) seems much slower so for me
a fast card is essential for RAW.

10fps is 10fps and at full resolution. That's very cool.
Max frames is 10 and there's no AF changes.

The raw converter software is pretty extensive but I'm
already on top of it which is a surprise. It's quite easy
to get more pleasing images this way too so RAW is a
great feature on this camera.

There are also lots of features in the camera like
beauty shot and a kind of HDR called smart range.

The beauty shot settings have an effect but it's up to
you as to whether you'll like the effect. I do. They can
change skin tone (brighter) and re-touch blemishes to
make people look younger. It can be combined with
some setting changes to create a flattering portrait.

The smart range doesn't work for scenes with any
motion in them, which includes leaves gently moving in
the breeze. It doesn't seem to have much effect
indoors either, so I'm still working out how to get the
most from this feature.

Image quality is surprisingly good for a little camera like
this with good sharp details at low iso, but of course at
100% you can see minor effects of noise even at
iso80. Samsung haven't revolutionised small sensor
cams. The F200EXR is cleaner but it's only noticeable
at over 70%. RAW files can be tweaked for better
performance but for me they're not hugely better re
noise so far.

I haven't tried the video much yet so I can't comment
on that but it seems okay on my hdtv, except in low
light and the auto WB sucks in video mode..

The panorama sweep works for a 180 degree shot,
but the final image is only 720 pixels high by about
3800 pixels wide iirc.

Manual focus is useful for macro - set it to minimum
focus distance and move the cam for the best
reproduction ratio, then the screen is just good
enough to tweak the focus, but only just.

Anyway, I like this cam because it has the right blend
of compromises that I want, but if noise at 100%
bothers you then you'd do better with a micro4/3rds
and bigger pockets, or perhaps an LX5 in due course.
For me, I have a D90 for that.

Is it better than the Fuji ? Well, the Fuji gives better
jpegs so I gave that 4 and this cam 3.5, but this cam
has RAW so I'm happy to keep this cam and sell the
Fuji.