Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T50

Add to: 
User reviews (8)
3.86
7.1 megapixels | 3" screen | 38 – 114 mm (3×)
Average rating: 3.86
5 stars
(3)
4 stars
(3)
3 stars
(1)
2 stars
(1)
1 stars
(0)

Most helpful user reviews

The list below shows the five most helpful user reviews. See all 8 reviews...
joebartone
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: joebartone posted on Nov 3, 2006 UTC

Opinion: I had to exchange this camera for a different model due to white spots in all my pictures taken with the flash.

Problems: Terrible white spots in all the pictures taken with the flash.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
gxcDesign
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: gxcDesign posted on Dec 11, 2006 UTC

Opinion: Sony will never learn, there are times when form no matter what will never defeat
function. Sounds like a good camera on paper, but not worth it.

Problems: 1. Quality of image is unacceptable 7.1
2. Internal memory no real use

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
ciptin
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: ciptin posted on Dec 29, 2006 UTC

Opinion: i have to say that i don't usually post this kind of reviews, but in all fairness i want to do some justice to this nice camera, especially against the previous posters here.
if you want to buy this camera read some of the reviews for t30 and t10, i found them more realistic...

even i'm a professional photographer i've bought this camera for my family pictures.
reguarding my previous experience with digital cameras (if relevant):
for my work i' ve owned: nikon d100, fuji s2, kodak 14n, phase one h25 and now phase one p45, soon to be upgrated to p45+.
my previous "family camera" were: nikon 990, canon a70, canon g6 and now sony t50.

the pros:
excelent GUI, intuitive menu.
excelent movie mode, probably industry best at this time (2006), with good AF, zoom during shooting.
very good image quality in the daylight (i mean on the par with any 6mpx DSLR).
very well built.

i don't mind for the lack of raw mode, i highly reccomend this camera for the casual shooter.
if you're interested in raw and stuff, you're probably looking after a DSLR anyway, because the T50 is just another kind of camera.

Problems: the cons:
bad, bad red eye effect (in fact, it is a kind of...white pupils instead of red...)

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
SonnySD
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: SonnySD posted on Jan 10, 2007 UTC

Opinion: this camera replaced my Canon sd-800. Canon had the worst video sound ever. It could not handle high volume sounds from concerts. It was very dissapointing.
So now T50 arrives. What a beauty, both from outside and inside.
takes very sharp pictures under most light conditions. Supersteady shot seems to be working better that Canon. High Iso mode has less noise than Canon SD800. The videos have perfect sound quality.
The touch screen is so easy to use and classy.
The battery life is outstanding together with the battery remaining indicator. Canons do not have this indicator for some reason.

I would recommend this camera strongly to any P&S fanatics. especially with a price around $340 online. get the black one by the way ;)

Problems: No wide angle as I am used to at my previous SD800.
No steel body like in Canon SD800.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report