Sony Alpha DSLR-A380

14.2 megapixels | 2.7" screen | APS-C sensor

User reviews

Average rating: 3.51
5 stars
(2)
4 stars
(3)
3 stars
(0)
2 stars
(0)
1 stars
(2)
Sort by
marabout_mm
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: marabout_mm posted on Apr 7, 2010 UTC

Opinion: Much worse then A350. Rather poor image quality with kit lens.

Problems: - poor effects with kit lens
- too low possition of flesh when open

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Joaquinnekuh
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Joaquinnekuh posted on Feb 11, 2010 UTC

Opinion: To pirinchov: everybody has the right to freedom of opinion

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
cluening
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: cluening posted on Jan 27, 2010 UTC

Opinion: WTF - guys, stop acting like idiots!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
LEngHoe
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: LEngHoe posted on Dec 29, 2009 UTC

Opinion: why pirinchov beeing compensate twice? once by catamaran and once by ollecram. just to compensate back.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
makithaca
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: makithaca posted on Nov 22, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I have Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 for 15 days now and it is
my entrance to dslr world, before I had only compaq
cameras with the last to be SONY T100. My new Sony is
is a positive change for me, I took it with the Sony 18-
55mm lens and the Tamron 55-200mm and I can say that
I am very satisfied!

Problems: Nothing special to be mentioned!

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
Ollecram
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: Ollecram posted on Nov 17, 2009 UTC

Opinion: To compensate Princhov's crap....

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report
mrmanny
0 out of 0 users have found this review helpful
By: mrmanny posted on Aug 24, 2009 UTC

Opinion: I have had a chance to wring out the Sony A380 DSLR the past week. I have read a number of reviews which claim the image quality leaves something to be desired. I have also had opportunity to take sufficient photos with the Canon Xsi, T1i and Nikon D5000 to say the Sony A380 image quality is the equal or better than the other cameras. I have also had the chance to try the older Sony A350 and can say the image quality of the A380 has improved. The Sony RAW conversion software has changed so the A380 RAW files will not open with the older software but Sony gives you a disc where as Nikon wants $179 for their software plus the price of the camera. I used the kit lens which comes with the Sony A380 and did not feel upgrading to an expensive Zeiss lens was required for the photos I take. The articulated screen is stiff but probably will loosen up with some use. The live view on the Nikon D5000 is a joke and only suitable for taking pictures of buildings and table top photography. The live view function on the Canon is not articulated and only slightly better whereas the Sony will take live view shots of moving objects and is handy for a waist level finder. The reason the image quality was rated only 4.5 is because that is all you are going to get out of a half frame sensor no matter what brand of camera.

Now you have a choice of memory cards and can use SD cards or Pro-Duo. Also like the feel of the memory acess door as it it not flabby rubber.

My only reservation with the Sony A380 is the price which I believe should be lower when compared to the feature sets on the competition and that is why I lowered the value for the money to a 4.0.

This is not intended as a pro camera to take punishment with a metal body and a shutter rated at half a million photos and I thought the construction is equal to the Canon Xsi, T1i and Nikon D5000

Problems: I don't have any problems..worked right out of the box and did not have a sneaky recall as per Nikon D5000.

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Report