|
|
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
| Visible chromatic aberrations in an "every day shot" (very few and far between) | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Our now standard chromatic aberration test shot | |
The DiMAGE 7's lens also did well in our barrel and pincushion distortion tests. Considering its full wide angle is a very wide 28mm equiv. (something unusual for digital cameras) its measured an 1.3% barrel distortion is an excellent performance. Also at the telephoto end there's really very little pincushion distortion, 0.8% is very easy to live with.
![]() |
![]() |
| Barrel Distortion, 1.3% @ Wide Angle | Pincushion Distortion, 0.8% @ Full Tele |
Quite early on (after we published some samples from an early pre-production camera) there was a lot of talk about noise in DiMAGE 7 images. Below you'll see a crop of the gray patches from our standard colour patch test chart. Yes, there's still some visible noise, it's not as smooth and clean as some we've seen, though it's certainly not a distraction or a fault.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Red Channel | Blue Channel | Green Channel |
Breaking the patch down into red, green and blue components it's clear to see that most of the noise is isolated to the red channel (though there is still some visible in green and blue). It's certainly no more than we've seen from (say) Canon's G1 @ ISO 100.
The early production unit I used for this review did indeed have a stuck pixel, it was at location 1880,1635 and always showed as white (and of course had some knock-on effect on surrounding pixels).
| Full image | Stuck pixel cropped and magnified 400% |
The DiMAGE 7 offers fully automatic plus a set of pre-programmed white balance settings as well as the manual preset option. Overall the Auto mode worked best in natural light and the presets worked well in all light apart from Fluorescent (which is always tough because there are three or four different tube temperatures). The manual preset was pretty hard to fool and provided the most consistent white balance across different types of light.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Outdoors, Auto | Outdoors, Cloudy | Outdoors, Manual |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Incandescent, Auto | Incandescent, Incandescent | Incandescent, Manual |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Fluorescent, Auto | Fluorescent, Fluorescent | Fluorescent, Manual |
There has been talk of a noise reduction system on the DiMAGE 7, certainly looking at the results below it's clear that the camera can handle moderately long exposures and that there's very little 'hot pixel' noise for these long exposures. It's clear that the DiMAGE 7 is capable of taking nice, clean, night exposures.
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 100, 4 sec, F4.0 | |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 200, 4 sec, F4.0 | |
![]() |
![]() |
| ISO 400, 4 sec, F4.0 | |
Dynamic range simply defines the range of light the camera is able to capture before it either loses detail in darkness (shadows for example) or blows out a highlight (edges of chromed metals are good examples of this). Most consumer digital cameras only have a 8-bit analog to digital converters, plus their CCD's are not built to have a particularly large dynamic range, Minolta state in their specifications that the DiMAGE 7 has a 12-bit ADC.
Using our new dynamic
range measurement method we measured the DiMAGE 7's dynamic range
as (higher numbers are better except for noise):
| Camera | ISO | Noise | Range | Bits | Density | dB |
|
Minolta DiMAGE 7 |
100* | 0.13 | 354:1 | 8.5 | 2.5D | 51 |
| 100 | 0.14 | 289:1 | 8.2 | 2.5D | 49 | |
| 200 | 0.22 | 239:1 | 7.9 | 2.4D | 48 | |
| 400 | 0.41 | 153:1 | 7.3 | 2.2D | 44 | |
| 800 | 0.98 | 111:1 | 6.8 | 2.0D | 41 |
* In-camera sharpening set to "Soft"
At ISO 100 results were quite similar to those of the Nikon Coolpix 990, at ISO 200 and 400 there's more dynamic range but roughly the same noise measurement.