|
![]() |
![]() |
| ICX252 2088 x 1550 effective pixel area (green) 7.20mm x 5.35mm |
Masked ICX252 1856 x 1392 effective pixel area (green) 6.40mm x 4.80mm |
| Plastic chip package (13.8mm x 12.0mm) | |
| Glass cover (12.7mm x 10.9mm) | |
| Effective pixel area | |
| Unused (wasted?) pixels on Pro90 IS |
Putting things into perspective
- With its 2.6 mp the Pro90 has 34% more pixel area than a 2.1 megapixel digital camera
- With the full 3.1 mp you'd gain 192 pixels horizontally and 144 vertically
![]()
I f you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital
Photography Glossary before diving into this review (it may help you
understand some of the terms used).
|
Photographs of the camera were taken with a Canon EOS-D30, images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (normally 1024 x 768 or smaller if cropped) image in a new window. To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top. DPReview calibrate their monitors using Adobe Gamma at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C. |
This review is Copyright 2001 Phil Askey and the review in part or in whole may NOT be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author. For information on reproducing any part of this review (or any images) please contact: Phil Askey.
| Share: | ||||
| Actions: | < Previous | Next > | Print page |
Please wait, fetching latest prices.



