
White Balance
The HP 812 is the first camera I've used (for some time)
which doesn't allow you to select white balance. This means that the normal
array of nine white balance samples we provide has had to be reduced to
just three, Auto White balance in our three different lighting conditions.
 |
 |
 |
| Outdoors, Auto WB |
Incandescent, Auto
WB |
Fluorescent, Auto WB |
The 812 did remarkably well in both natural (outdoors) and incandescent
light. Indeed the incandescent automatic white balance is among the best
I've seen of any level of digital camera. It's a shame the same can't
be said of fluorescent light white balance, here is a good example of
where manually selectable white balance would have been very useful.

Low Light Focus
This
test measures the minimum amount of light under which the camera can still
focus. The focus target is our lens distortion test chart (shown here
on the right), camera is positioned exactly 2 m (6.6 ft) away.
Light levels are gradually dropped until the camera can no longer focus.
This is carried out at both wide angle and telephoto zoom positions (as
more light reaches the focusing systems with a larger aperture).
This test target is the optimum type of subject for most "contrast
detect" AF systems (as it has a vertical line at its center), you
should consider the results below the best you could expect to achieve.
| Lens position |
Aperture |
Lowest light focus |
| Wide angle (37 mm) |
F2.6 |
2.5 EV (14.1 Lux, 1.3 foot-candle) |
| Telephoto (111 mm) |
F4.8 |
2.5 EV (14.1 Lux, 1.3 foot-candle) |
Light intensity
(Lux) = 2.5 x 2^EV (@ ISO 100), 10.76391 Lux = 1 foot-candle (fc)
Despite repeating our test several times I continued to get the same
result, the amount of light required for an AF lock was the same at both
wide angle and telephoto. This isn't what we'd expect as more light should
be getting through (wider max aperture) at wide angle. Anyway, 2.5 EV
isn't too bad, but it's not particularly stellar either.

Flash Performance
The 812's flash performance was a fairly mixed bunch. Just like in the
white balance tests the 812 does remarkably (almost artificially) well
on the colour patch flash shot test. However, there's noticeable drop
off in the 2 m wall test. It does appear as though HP has addressed the
blue cast problem which occured in the original firmware.
 |
 |
 |
| Skin tone test: No colour cast, good
skin tones otherwise. |
Wide angle 2 m wall test: As we'd expect
the camera's flash doesn't have enough power to fill the frame, note
the drop-off in the corners. |
Very bright exposure but very good colour.
Almost "painted on". |

Barrel and Pincushion Distortion
As we would expect the 812's distortion performance was
virtually identical to that seen in Pentax's Optio 430 (because they share
the same lens mechanism). Slightly higher than average barrel distortion
at wide angle and no measurable pincushion distortion at telephoto.
 |
 |
| Barrel Distortion, 1.1% @ wide angle |
Pincushion Distortion, 0% @ telephoto |

Purple Fringing (Chromatic Aberrations)
The 812 did fairly well on our standard chromatic aberration
test chart, just a hint of purple fringing but nothing to be really worried
about. In every day shots with overexposed details the tendancy was towards
a thin blue or green fringe.
 |
 |
| You can see a purple fringing
below the overexposed detail and some blue/green above it. |
 |
 |
| Our now standard chromatic aberration
test shot - mostly blooming |

Overall Image Quality / Specific Issues
When I first reviewed the HP 812 I didn't like the image
quality. The primary issue was very soft images which had a 'video like'
look and sometimes had noticeable noise reduction. Since the new firmware
things have improved, although I'd still say that the 812 is softer than
many other four megapixel digital cameras and it's resolution isn't up
to its four megapixel billing.
The other point to remember is my disappointment with the
camera's JPEG encoding algorithm, this means that if image quality is
important to you then you will avoid anything under maximum resolution
(thus use either   
or   ).
New firmware improves sharpness
As you can see from the side-by-side samples below the new v1.00.11 firmware
does go a long way to improving the 812's sharpness (although it's still
softer than others). While resolution hasn't visibly increased the overall
look of images is much sharper and more acceptable. It also appears that
the camera now has an improved moiré removal algorithm. It's good
to see a big manufacturer taking fast action to fix a problem and get
the fix into the hands of the users. Kudos.
| Old firmware |
New firmware
(v1.00.11) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Colour Shift
Again, from the same sample as above the orange colour you can see below
should actually be bright red. You can see hints of the true colour around
the edge of the first crop, the rest of the orange colour seen was not
in the original shot.
Dynamic Brightness / Contrast Control
Although HP hasn't publicized this the 812 does have a rather interesting
feature which automatically alters the S-curve (used for translating the
linear data from the CCD into a 'gamma correct' sRGB image). This automatic
selection means that although the 812 doesn't have an exposure compensation
control it does do a very good job of correcting the image before it's
written away. This can clearly be seen in the two examples below.
Two very different shots, but both have similar levels of "brightness",
that is the camera's use of the entire range of greyscale (whites come
out white, blacks not washed out) while maintaining as much of the source
dynamic range as possible.
|