Comments
The important thing to understand about the D700
is that it is NOT a point-and-shoot camera, you *can*
point and shoot once you've set it up but you must be careful
about doing so. I found ensuring white balance and focus the
two most important things about the D700. The "WB Hold"
feature enables you to get a very accurate white balance,
but it's important to constantly check and re-balance if lighting
conditions change.
Image quality is overall excellent, with little
or no chromatic abberations, a good tonal balance and neutral
colours. Lens performance was good although there is barrel
distortion it's no more than found on other digital cameras.
Images have a tendancy to come out with less
contrast than other cameras, this can be corrected fairly
easily and is really a matter of preference. Other noticable
is that the D700 produces less saturated colours than other
digicams (I found a saturation increase of +15 in Photoshop
normally did the trick). Not in itself a bad thing, but they
*are* less saturated than real-life and that can make images
look "dull" straight out of the camera.
I found an exposure adjustment of +0.25EV in
most daylight shots made quite a positive difference to otherwise
"dull" (under-exposed) images.
Therefore the D700 is a camera which requires
careful balance both in the setup before taking and careful
balancing in the "digital darkroom" after (depending
on the image destination: screen / printer). An example of
what I'm talking about can be seen here (1/60s, F2.4, +0.25
EV compensation):

As you can see the image was slighty under-exposed
leaving the image looking "dull", also the black
point wasn't "black", stretching the histogram (using
levels in Photoshop) produced a much more "contrasty"
image without any artifacts.
Compared to
Below are some comparison shots (first of a PhotoDisc
poster, second of a more "3D" arrangement) with
the Nikon Coolpix 950 (unfair pixel advantage) and Canon Powershot
Pro 70 (click on any image for the original).
| Sony DSC-D700 |
Canon Powershot Pro 70 |
Nikon Coolpix 950 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Obvious differences here:
- D700 images look "dull" compared to Pro70 and
CP950, again, a function of the digital darkroom
- Pro70 produces noticeably more detailed image with sharper
focus and more accurate colours
- D700 RED is not perfectly red (contains some blue), nor
is the 950 (contains some green)
- 950 has the most saturated and "colourful" looking
image, however the Pro70 has the most accurate colours
(naked eye comparing to the original objects)
- 950 shows its pixel advantage in bringing out more detail
in many areas of the images
- 950 focused quicker but less accurately than the other
two cameras
Overall, the D700 holds its own against some
of the newer cameras (worth noting that the D700 and Pro70
were actually announced about the same time). The D700 does
require more "digital darkroom" work on its images,
if you're comfortable with this then the D700 is a VERY flexible
camera.
|